Jump to Navigation

Pittsburgh Personal Injury Law Blog

This blog is sponsored by Gismondi & Associates, a law firm that has been representing injury victims in Pennsylvania for the past 30 years. We hope to provide you with useful and interesting information on this page, things about law that would be useful to know if you or a family member has suffered an injury caused by someone else, or if you are simply someone who takes an interest in the legal system. Either way, check back to this page from time to time because we will update it regularly with topics of interest to you.

In the meantime, if you or someone you know needs to speak with a lawyer about an injury or death caused by a medical mistake, an automobile accident or any other type of injury case, feel free to contact Gismondi & Associates at 866-757-6585 and also visit our website at www.gislaw.com.

Pennsylvania Highways still dangerous

News reports today indicated that while most states are seeing fewer and fewer deaths on the highways, Pennsylvania was one of the few states that saw deaths rise during the past year.

More than 1,300 people died on Pennsylvania highways last year.

It is not clear why Pennsylvania was out of step with most other states in reducing fatalities. Some think it has to do with Pennsylvania's rather lax seat belt law which only permits police officers to issue citations if they discover a driver is not wearing a seat belt in the course of a traffic stop for some other reason. Many other states allow officers to do random checks for seat belt use with no separate reason to stop the vehicle.

Drunk driving is always a prime cause of many highway fatalities, but there is no reason to think that the problem is greater in Pennsylvania than in other states where that enforcement is more lax here.

One distinguishing feature in Pennsylvania might be the mountainous terrain that intersects some of our major highways such as the Turnpike and Interstate 80.

Pennsylvania remains one of the busiest trucking routes in the country since it sits as a geographic link between the very populous northeast and the heartland of the country. The Turnpike and Interstate 80 are two of the heaviest traveled truck roads in the country.

Certainly our office has been involved over the years in a number of highway fatalities involving drunk drivers, trucking accidents and general wrongful death claims related to automobile use.

As a result, many of the trucking fatalities we have handled over the years happened on either the Turnpike or Interstate 80. Regardless of where they occur, trucking accidents involve many special rules that lawyers must be familiar with. The federal government heavily regulates interstate trucking, and legal cases are often won or lost based on whether you can prove a violation of one of those safety rules.

Truck drivers are required to keep detailed logs to prove that they did not exceed federal limits on driving time. Also, maintenance logs on the truck and global tracking systems sometimes become key bits of evidence in trucking cases.

In highway fatalities involving regular automobiles, accident reconstruction experts are often critical to deciding whether we have good grounds for a wrongful death claim. Those experts can look at thinks such as skid marks, vehicle damage, and roadway debris and figure out how fast a vehicle was going and where the point of impact occurred. These facts can be very important in determining who was at fault for an accident.

We certainly hope that Pennsylvania reverses the trend and joins other states in lowering highway fatalities. Unfortunately, as long as there are careless drivers, there will be fatal accidents.

Emergency rooms improve "look" but what about medical care?

Over the past few years, several hospitals in the Pittsburgh area have invested millions of dollars to "spruce up" their emergency rooms. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11342/1195428-455.stm While some of this may be motivated by legitimate need, there is no question that marketing and public relations play a role in improving the atmosphere, emergency rooms are high volume, and likely high profit, areas for the hospital, and they no doubt have figured out if you create a nice "feel" in the room, it is more likely that people will use your emergency room than some competitor's.

Certainly it is nice to go an emergency room and have a comfortable area to sit and perhaps view a television, but no doubt what patients are most interested in receiving is good medical care. Over the years, a very high percentage of our medical malpractice cases have occurred in emergency room in various Pittsburgh hospitals. Some of the most common cases involve the failure to diagnose heart attacks and strokes; the failure to detect head trauma and other brain injuries such as blood clots, and also "missed" fractures on x-rays. Medication errors also occur with regularity in the emergency room. These medical mistakes often lead to a variety of personal injury and wrongful death claims.

Hospitals would do well to focus on improving some of their systems in the emergency room and not merely adding a fresh coat of pain to the waiting area. By their very nature, emergency rooms are high-traffic areas of the hospital and, sadly, the shuffling of patients from doctor-to-nurse and back-and-forth and often leads to mistakes.

Also hospitals, and patients, can benefit from improved systems to prioritize patients according to how serious their condition is. The medical term for this is "triage." It is just common sense that people who come in with a potential heart attack or stroke should be given far more attention than someone with an ankle sprain. Some hospitals have developed "fast track" programs to take care of more routine, simple illnesses and other dedicated "tracks" to take of cardiac or neurologic problems.

Another problem in emergency rooms is the training and experience of the doctors. Many hospitals, particularly those outside of metropolitan Pittsburgh, are not staffed by Board certified emergency physicians. Instead, they may have family doctors who are simply "moonlighting" in the E.R. Additionally, some emergency rooms are not fully staffed during the evening or over-night hours.

Yes, it is nice to be in an emergency room that has been "spruced up," but more than that, patients want to be in an emergency room that has first-quality care. In short, most people would take a great doctor over a comfortable sofa any day.

Coal mine offers settlement to families

The new owners of the Upper Big Branch Mine will pay a huge fine and also offer to pay millions of dollars to the families of the victims of an April 2010 explosion that killed 29 miners in West Virginia. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11341/1195085-455.stm

Under the plan, the company offered $46 million dollars to the families of the 29 miners who died. They also offered to spend millions on safety improvements at the mine and to pay a multi-million dollar fine to the federal government.

The Upper Big Branch disaster is one of many industrial explosions that occur every year in this country. Fortunately, most of those explosions are not as serious as the one in West Virginia.

Our office is currently involved in handling several Pittsburgh personal injury cases relating to two separate explosions which occurred at U.S. Steel's Clairton Coke Works outside Pittsburgh. As in the mine disaster, the explosions at U.S. Steel are related to unsafe practices with industrial gas. At Clairton, there is a great deal of coke oven gas being generated on the premises, and that gas is highly explosive if not handled properly.

One of the cases we are handling involves a wrongful death case on behalf of a worker who left a wife and small children whereas the other case involves several people who suffered serious burn injuries.

There are many federal laws that govern how companies are supposed to handle explosive gas. In most accidents, we find that there were violations of the federal standards that caused the explosion.

Penn State Sex Abuse Scandal: Legal Questions/Answers

Although no civil law suits have yet been filed against Penn State in the growing sex abuse scandal, there is certainly no doubt that they will be coming down the road. People have asked legal questions about these cases, and we try to answer some of the most common questions here.

1. What is the statute of limitations on these claims? - It depends on when the abuse occurred. If the incident with the victim happened before late June 2002, then the child typically would have until the age of twenty (20) to file a legal claim. If the abuse happened after late June 2002, the victim would have until age thirty (30).

The reason for this distinction is because the statute of limitations in Pennsylvania was changed and made longer as of late June 2002. Incidentally, the most highly publicized of the many incidents at Penn State - - - the one that allegedly occurred in the shower at the football facilities - - - occurred in the Spring of 2002 and, therefore, that victim would have only until age twenty to bring a legal claim.

2. Does Penn State have immunity from legal claims because they a state school? - The short answer to this is no. Although many state institutions have immunity (That is a legal term that means they cannot be sued.) that usually only applies to agencies that are 100% government related. Although Penn State, like the University of Pittsburgh and Temple University, receives some state funds, they are not a state institution or a state-owned school. Therefore, they do not have immunity from the law suits that will be filed by the victims.

3. What sorts of damages can the victims claim? - The law suits will seek damages for physical harm as well as the emotional toll of the abuse. Those are called compensatory damages because they are meant to compensate the individual for what they have gone through. The amount any victim is entitled to receive could vary from person to person depending on the extent of the abuse and the effect it had on them. Those awards could be quite large.

In addition to compensatory damages, the victims could also claim punitive damages. That is a monetary award not necessarily related to the harm suffered by the victim but instead a separate amount designed to punish the institution. In order to receive punitive damages, the victim would need to prove that Penn State's conduct was outrageous and reckless.

4. Who will pay the damages? - Penn State likely has liability insurance that would apply to compensatory damages be owed to victims. It is not clear exactly how much such insurance Penn State has and whether or not it is sufficient to cover all of the claims.

If punitive damages are awarded, it is likely that Penn State does not have insurance to cover those amounts.

Therefore, any amounts not covered by insurance, either for compensatory or punitive damages, would have to be paid out of the University's own general funds.

5. Could the individual Penn State employees have to pay damages to the victims? - Certainly there could be damage awards entered against any of the individuals, but they may not have money to cover those claims. The University, however, would be responsible to pay on their behalf because their bad acts occurred while they were on the job.

Tragic Helicopter Crash Raises Aviation Issues

A Pittsburgh area newly-wed couple died in a helicopter crash in Hawaii last week. The new bride and groom were on a sightseeing helicopter that crashed into the side of a mountain.

It is routine in situations like this that the NTSB would have a team of investigators on-site within a day or two of the accident. The NTSB investigates all U.S. Air Flight 427 whether they involve private aircraft or large commercial airlines. It is not clear whether the helicopter had an on-board "black box," but if so, that would be the first piece of evidence the investigators will seek to locate. In addition to the black box, investigators typically will do a "tear down" on the engine and inspect other portions of the helicopter for signs of failure.

Our office has been involved in handling a number of aviation cases over the years including our service as one of the lead counsel on the most famous aviation case in the Pittsburgh area, the 1995 crash of U.S. Air Flight 427.  Although the helicopter was no doubt owned by a private sightseeing company, they would be regulated by a host of FAA rules governing issues including whether the pilot was properly trained and whether the aircraft itself had been properly maintained. In order to get answers to those questions, the NTSB will secure the "log book" of the pilot. This is a mandated record that every pilot must keep that lists their history of flying and training. The NTSB will also secure the log books for the helicopter's engine and hull. These records will contain most of the maintenance information on the aircraft.

In addition to inspecting the helicopter itself, any aviation case involves a consideration of weather conditions.

It would be anticipated that in the coming weeks the NTSB will issue a preliminary report on the accident, and then eventually a final report will be filed by the agency in Washington, DC.

Will The Public Pay For Lawsuits Against Penn State?

John Gismondi is quoted in the KDKA article on the Penn State sexual assualt scandal.

Penn State Faces Civil Lawsuits

The Penn State sexual abuse case reminds us of a similar case we handled a few years ago involving a local coach who engaged in a pattern of sexual abuse with young boys on his team. In that case, as in the Penn State situation, we argued successfully that the school had prior knowledge of the coach's conduct and that they looked the other way and continued to allow him to have contact with young boys.

Undoubtedly, the sexual abuse scandal at Penn State will expose the University to a likely onslaught of civil lawsuits. Any time people have knowledge of sexual abuse being committed by a person, they have an obligation to control that person's activity and interaction with children, particularly when that interaction takes place on school property or is facilitated by the child abuser's standing at the University.

In the Penn State cases, some of the abuse incidents happened on Penn State property or during Penn State trips. Even the incidents that happened outside of Penn State activities may expose the school to liability because the perpetrator, Jerry Sandusky, was still arguably an employee or representative of the University even after he resigned as a coach in 1999.

The school could be responsible not only for damages for the physical harm and pain and suffering caused to the victims, but they could also be on the hook for punitive damages if a jury was to conclude that their conduct was outrageous. While the school no doubt has liability insurance, they may end up paying out of their own pocket as well for the harm in these cases. Each of these cases will have different facts, but the common theme in all of them will be that Penn State failed to control activity on their premises or failed to control the activity of one their employees.

John Gismondi weighs in on the "Civil" liability at PSU

Click here to read the article in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette today, "Civil suits could weigh heavily on PSU."

Brain test detects awareness in "Vegetative" Patient

A recent story in the New York Times indicated that doctors at two hospitals in Europe detected signs of awareness in three severely brain-injured people who supposedly were in a "vegetative state." A vegetative state generally means that someone has no awareness of their surroundings. The doctors used brain wave patters on an EEG test to reach their conclusions.

Vehicle fire leads to death in Plum

A New Kensington man died as a result of a fire in a vehicle over a weekend. The Coroner determined that the cause of death was acute burns and smoke inhalation.

Unfortunately, vehicles can often be involved in serious fires because they carry such a large fuel supply. In this case, it is not clear exactly what caused the fire in the vehicle. Over the years, there have been an number of lawsuits for wrongful death or personal injury filed against car manufacturers such as Ford, General Motors, Honda, Toyota, Chrysler, on the ground that the vehicles did not have enough safety devices to prevent fuel tank fires. Many times, those lawsuits are based on the location of the fuel tank or the vehicle's failure to have some device which shuts off the flow of fuel once an accident has occurred. These product liability cases are some times referred to as "crash worthiness" claims because they deal with whether the car has been designed well enough to withstand a crash.

Our office has been involved in certain product liability cases involving the design or safety features of motor vehicles. We have also handled a number of cases involving fire or burn injuries.

Burns injuries, whether they occur in motor vehicle accidents, or fires and explosions are among the most serious of all personal injury cases. They often lead to long and very painful periods of recovery with extensive medical treatment and future medical costs.

You Have Questions. We Have Answers | Ask About Your Case

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close